Should breed rankings be re-calculated?
- Yes
- No
0 voters
So I was thinking today on my commute about breed rankings. Right now they primarily reward producers of early bloomers. 2YOs get “extra credit” for the same achievements (except MSW, which counts the same regardless of age).
Is that really fair, though? What if your stallion/mare throws amazing jumpers, who therefore wouldn’t really do well until 3 and up? What if you’re breeding for longevity so you don’t aim for 2yo stars but would like your babies to last until 6+? Etc.
Which got me to thinking, rather than reward based simply on age (which was a bit arbitrary based on the hypothesis that 2yo races are more competitive/harder to win, so therefore it’s a bigger achievement), horses could be awarded points based on each year of racing, with breed rankings averaged out over all foals’ years.
So, hypothetically, the following points could be awarded:
Multiple stakes wins in a year: 15 points
Single stakes win in a year: 12 points
Multiple stakes places in a year: 10 points
Single stakes place in a year: 8 points
Multiple wins in a year: 3 points
Single win in a year: 1 point
Using a mare (for an easier example, since she’s got less foals), let’s take Move Boldly’s foals:
Debatable Move: 3 racing years, 31 points
- Single stakes place at 2: 8 points
- Multiple stakes wins at 3: 15 points
- Single stakes place at 4: 8 points
Pyromaniac: 5 racing years, 2 points
- Unplaced at 2: 0 points
- Single win at 3: 1 point
- Single win at 4: 1 point
- Unplaced at 5: 0 points
- Non-winner at 6: 0 points
Pyrotechnics: 4 racing years, 12 points
- Single stakes place at 3: 8 points
- Single win at 4: 1 point
- Multiple wins at 5: 3 points
- Non-winner at 6: 0 points
Strawberryswing: 3 racing years, 16 points
- Non-winner at 2: 0 points
- Multiple stakes winner at 3: 15 points
- Single win at 4: 1 point
Sir Irish Knight: 2 racing years, 3 points
- Non-winner at 2: 0 points
- Multiple wins at 3: 3 points
Artic High: 1 racing year, 1 point
- Single win at 3: 1 point
Overall, she has 6 foals who’ve raced a total of 18 years and earned 65 points. So her average points would be 3.6.
Obviously the breed ranking numbers and/or points for racing achievements would need to be tweaked a bit since she’s gold ranked (with 8.2 points), but when you look in more detail, her best foals aren’t all that consistent over time - Debatable Move was, but the rest were somewhat iffy.
This is all just what sprang to mind on the bus this morning, so I’m open to feedback, but it occurred to me that breed rankings could be falsely optimistic (or pessimistic) if you have especially brilliant but inconsistent horses. Personally speaking, I’d rather know that a horse is only silver ranked but will consistently produce horses who win year after year as opposed to appearing amazing and gold (or platinum) ranked based on one foal having a good season once. (This is especially true for stallions, but also for mares.)
So…thoughts? Suggestions for improvements?